Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 2201 - 2220 of 4,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
Constitution does not have this kind of permanent entrenchment, except with respect to the Senate (a provision also paralleled by the German Constitution). [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
  Now, earlier this week the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 41-page opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Moreno, 233 F.3d 937, 940-41 (7th Cir. 2000); U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:37 pm by Coral Beach
  “Illnesses started on dates from Jan. 1, 2019, to May 24, 2019. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:55 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
The proposed law would take effect on January 1, 2022. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:39 pm by AmandaWilwert
”  More specifically, the statute provides that the Court “shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim by or against, or dispute with, a contractor arising under section 7104(b)(1) of title 41 [the Contracts Disputes Act], . . . on which a decision of the contracting officer has been issued under section 6 of that Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:37 am by info@thomasjhenrylaw.com
You have the responsibility to send a completed claim form (DWC-41) to the Division of Workers’ Compensation (you have one year.) [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm
Extracellular toxin production by large cell numbers of S. aureus causes foodborne illness; ingestion of the bacteria themselves does not. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:02 am
The reports included 1 murder, 5 rapes, 19 robberies, 41 assaults, 163 burglaries, 375 incidents of domestic violence (fourth highest in the county), 14 bias crimes and 109 cases of police force (third highest in the county). [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm by Alexander Volberding
§ 826.10, emphasis added) Emergency Paid Sick Leave (“EPSL”) does not apply where the employer does not have work for the employee: “An employee subject to one of these orders may not take paid sick leave where the employer does not have work for the employee. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 6:32 am by Shanelle Van
Third, Fihn contends that, while the TPNW does not raise the safeguards requirements, “this treaty does not lower the standard of safeguards from the NPT. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But it does mean  that Lexmarkshould be considered (as does the plain language of Lexma [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 4.7, but “does not satisfy” the criteria required for a higher rating is ineligible for that higher rating. [read post]