Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
Yet that decision was dubious in light of Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
The question arose again in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Comment This was an ambitious appeal and its outcome is unsurprising given the weight carried by the open justice principle in English law. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:59 am
These reflect the state of play of English law and also found their application in the Unwired Planet vs Huawei Court. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
Prosecution history estoppel has not been applied in English proceedings, and it remains to be seen whether that will change in light of Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
English, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
English, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:37 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
Court's Reliance on Record, Including Presentence Report, Was Adequate Basis for Imposed Sentence
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am
Render v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Mauldin et al.[10] It was argued on the basis of the “full appreciation” test stated by the Court of Appeal in Combined Air Mechanical v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:01 am
” [Deutsch v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 5:51 am
by Dana Northcraft and Natalie Birnbaum Since Roe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:07 pm
Oct. 16, 2008) In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
