Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
But I recently came across a 2016 Ohio appellate case, State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeals does not agree, and the conviction stands.The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:13 am
District Court Judge Linda V. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am
There are federalism questions raised by states' attempts to use state law to restrict what Defense Distributed can post on the Internet in other states. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
As far as acquired distinctiveness was concerned, although the EASY family of trade marks had acquired distinctiveness in Member States where English is spoken or commonly used, the threshold for distinctiveness was set very high and the "EASY" trade mark had not acquired distinctiveness on its own.2. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 9:13 pm
One example is Swimways Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:42 am
What does that mean, in simple English? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
This article’s thesis is that to whatever degree digital media poses a threat of disruption to a common law legal system, this disruptive effect will be more acute in Canada than in the United States or England. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
In Brady v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:43 am
As announced earlier today, this morning Advocate General (AG) Wathelet issued his Opinion [not yet available in English] in Levola Hengelo, C-310/17. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:48 am
ZS v DP on issue of mens rea in unlawful carnal knowledge. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Texas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 2:06 pm
National Institiute of Family Life Advocates v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
Even though the words of Article 13 are not expressly reflected in the English Trade Marks Act, the UK’s registrar of Trade Mark, whose task is to implement Article 13 on behalf of the State in Registry proceedings in the UK, must give effect to the binding provisions of Article 13. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:18 am
See related research in English and Chinese. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
