Search for: "English v. English" Results 2201 - 2220 of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
In the recent case of Stonebridge Underwriting Limited v Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange [2010] EWHC 2279, Mr Justice Christopher Clarke considered whether a dispute based on a "typical London market slip policy" should be heard in London or Ontario, Canada. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:25 am
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm by Howard Friedman
Franke, Opinion of Justice Katherine Franke in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Schwebel, The outlook for the continued vitality, or lack thereof, of investor–State arbitration Francisco González de Cossío, Enforcement of annulled awards: towards a better analytical approach Berk Demirkol, Interpretation of the dispute settlement clause in Turkish investment treaties with Turkic States Kateryna Bondar, Allocation of costs in investor-State and commercial arbitration: towards a harmonized approach Stephanie Mullen & Elizabeth Whitsitt, Quantum,… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
Both cases involve two pleas in law; 1) alleging breach of the principle of legal certainty and infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 [decisions of the Office shall state the reasons on which they are based]; and 2) alleging infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 [cannot register mark that it is identical or similar to the earlier mark, and is to be registered for goods or services which are not similar, where the earlier mark has a reputation and use of the mark would… [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by ROS BEVER, PARTNER IRWIN MITCHELL
It is clear the English courts are increasingly looking to encourage spouses to have financial independence from one another. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am by William A. Ruskin
The “public trust” doctrine is a legal principle derived from English Common Law. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Z (A child) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam) is, to my knowledge, the first reported relocation case since MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793.To briefly recap, in MK v CK it was made clear that the only principle to be drawn from Payne v Payne [2001] 1 FLR 1052 - which had skewed relocation decisions for ten years - was the paramountcy principle - everything else was guidance.Returning to Z (A child) :The facts: This case comes with a lot of 'baggage', primarily related to the… [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
  Although the German principle of deliberate selection or the US disclosure-dedication doctrine have not entered into English patent law, the Court is scrutinizing the language of the specification with renewed vigor following Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]