Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 66,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 7:54 am by Richard Frank
  Last February, EPA determined that the 23 targeted states previously had failed to do so, and adopted its own “Good Neighbor Rule. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
EVIDENCE WAS SUPPRESSED AND INDICTMENT DISMISSEDWhen the defendants were charged with drug and weapon offenses, (after a search warrant was executed at a Queens residential property), a motion was made to suppress the evidence and to dismiss the indictment, given that the search warrant was “overbroad” and lacking the requisite particularity required by law.In order to pass federal and state constitutional muster, warrants must specifically identify the places to be searched and… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s imprimatur in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The failed banks’ $548.7 billion in combined asset value represents the highest amount for failed banks in a single year, ever. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:45 am by Tobin Admin
The trial court dismissed the renewal action with prejudice, ruling that he failed to serve the defendant and hadn’t responded to State Farm’s discovery requests. [read post]