Search for: "Flood v. State"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 2,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 9 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.9 10 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 10 01/28/2008 provided that the applicable effective date for Parts A through B shall be as specifically set forth… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:00 am
Alexander, et al v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
What I did find was a 2007 Supreme Court decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 4:45 pm
Caldwell to Krell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 2:40 pm
A likely answer why that didn't happen came this week from the unlikeliest of places, a decision from Judge Keenan of the Southern District of New York, in a case called Kuriakose v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:04 am
When such evidence is considered, state courts are essentially second-guessing the FDA, and drug companies, nervous about state litigation, will have an incentive to flood the FDA with information. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:28 pm
Most of the Katrina suits were centered in the state and federal courts New Orleans and Gulfport, MS. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:48 pm
When such evidence is considered, state courts are essentially second-guessing the FDA and drug companies, nervous about state litigation, will have an incentive to flood the FDA with information. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
If plaintiffs were allowed to present evidence of fraud on the FDA, then "state courts are essentially second-guessing the FDA and drug companies, nervous about state litigation, will have an incentive to flood the FDA with information. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:51 pm
Autumn Fox and Doug Thompson won today in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
The state’s Supreme Judicial Court reexamined the issue in 2005 (Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
In Van de Kamp v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 2:29 am
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981) and Gottschalk v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 1:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:56 am
Ontiveros v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:17 pm
EPA and state EPA's would be flooded with new permits. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 9:52 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Rainford, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2474 (Admin) (17 October 2008) Times Newspapers Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2008] EWHC 2455 (Admin) (17 October 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Jones & Ors v Firkin-Flood [2008] EWHC 2417 (Ch) (17 October 2008) DCC Holdings (UK) Ltd v HM Revenue… [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:56 pm
The two FGCU coaches - former women’s volleyball head coach Jaye Flood, 51, and former women’s golf head coach Holly Vaughn, 46 - had brought their suit in federal court (Flood and Vaughn v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:01 pm
For example, in Wright v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 2:22 pm
An application for stay (Brunner v. [read post]
