Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 10,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 6:52 am
On appeal, de Maison's principal argument was that, after Kokesh v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:54 pm
See [Winner Int'l Royalty Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am
by Paul Alan Levy A recent blog post by Aaron Krowne, castigating the rejection of an anti-SLAPP motion filed by his company ML-Implode.com as "bizarre ruling" and "blatant miscarriage of justice," has gained wide circulation on the Internet. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:03 am
Since Judge Posner's opinion in McReynolds v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:11 am
It cites Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:40 pm
Court of Appeal stated in R. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm
The company, seizing on some language in the formal contract, decided that it had the exclusive right to renew the deal with NBC and, having done so, gained automatic extensions of its own options under the association contract. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:36 am
The Court heard arguments in Connick v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
State Bar of Wisconsin 19-831Issue: Whether Lathrop v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:44 am
United States was whether farmers who sell their farm while in bankruptcy have to pay capital gains tax to the IRS. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 7:01 pm
Facts: This case (O’Sullivan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:10 pm
In a recent unpublished New Jersey Appellate Division case (State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter of Fleischer, 107 AD2d 97; Matter of Blake… [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am
Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from the SEC and a mutual fund regarding the SEC’s decision to deny the fund’s application for an exemption for its method of accounting for potential deferred tax liability (Copley Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am
As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:23 am
On July 23, 1998, the CAFC in State Street Bank & Trust Co., v. [read post]
