Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 68,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2023, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The Court agreed to the special counsel's request for expedited briefing on whether to grant certiorari. ] Yesterday, Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a petition for certiorari before judgment in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, Plaintiff also brought a variety of state-law claims against the Division, his supervisors, and certain coworkers.The United Stated District Court granted summary judgment to Division on all of Plaintiff’s federal claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, Plaintiff also brought a variety of state-law claims against the Division, his supervisors, and certain coworkers.The United Stated District Court granted summary judgment to Division on all of Plaintiff’s federal claims. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:03 pm by Patricia Salkin
  Catholic Healthcare International, Inc. v Genoa Charter Township, 2023 WL 5838792 (6th Cir. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:54 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the case of Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Specifically, under the heading of “Copyrights and AI-generated Content,” the FTC states the following: Conduct that may violate the copyright laws––such as training an AI tool on protected expression without the creator’s consent or selling output generated from such an AI tool, including by mimicking the creator’s writing style, vocal or instrumental performance, or likeness—may also constitute an unfair method of competition or an unfair or… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am by CMS
Permission to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court in December 2022, and the hearing occurred on 17 and 18 October 2023. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:56 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Laufer on mootness grounds, Justice Jackson wrote separately to note her objection to the Court's established practice under United States v. [read post]