Search for: "In Re Hedges"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 2,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
I know what you’re thinking, but I swear it really is true… banks actually used to “FAIL.” Don’t laugh at me, I’m serious. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:39 am
They’re experiencing the garden, and it just changes their lifestyle. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:14 am
Driving these are several common themes, but I want to touch on three that seem particularly prevalent: a backlash against complexity in financial products and markets, the need for macro-prudential regulation to address systemic risk and re-working compensation practices to dis-incentivize excessive risk taking. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Masteralexis, If you’re hurt, where is home? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:56 am
He was interested in testing empirically the hypothesis that, just as Congress may seek to mitigate administrative subversion of statutory norms by writing more specific statutes, so Congress - or a legislature more generally - may want to use private enforcement, either solely or in combination with public enforcement, as a hedge against subversion of legislative preferences by an administrative agency controlled by an ideologically distant executive. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 11:08 am
There are many "asset classes" which we could write books about; and which hedge fund managers try to exploit for up to the second advances for their billion dollar funds. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 9:02 am
., 862 F.3d 346 (3d Cir. 2018) (finding standing to assert violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act based on plaintiff’s receipt of a single unsolicited call on her cell phone); In re Horizon Healthcare Servs. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm
“People are not looking for exit strategies from China, they’re looking to set up parallel operations to hedge their bets,” said Bretton Sciaroni, another American lawyer here. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:25 am
" "You're getting warmer," Justice Breyer quipped. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
I know what you’re thinking, but I swear it really is true… banks actually used to “FAIL. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
Some states–not South Carolina–note the “Three Pony Rule,” which the oft-cited case of In re Marriage of Patterson, 22 Kan. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
A third-year associate at Schulte Roth & Zabel left the firm for a hedge fund recently, for an annual salary of $700,000. [25] Though this is an extreme example, similar stories can be found throughout the industry.Associate turnover is also likely to occur due to the increase in the high billable hour requirements. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
The test will allow law school graduates to transport their bar scores across state lines without re-taking exams. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
When it comes to restricting use of the name of your host municipality, we’re no Yale: “Plaintiff Yale is a famous university located in New Haven, Connecticut,” said the lawsuit, filed in May in Federal District Court in Camden, N.J. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
The entire opinion is as follows: “In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
In a recent case involving two Bear Stearns hedge funds, the Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York refused to recognize proceedings pending in the Cayman Islands as either a foreign main or foreign nonmain proceeding, denying those entities Chapter 15 protection in the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
When it comes to restricting use of the name of your host municipality, we’re no Yale: “Plaintiff Yale is a famous university located in New Haven, Connecticut,” said the lawsuit, filed in May in Federal District Court in Camden, N.J. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
You're suggesting there may be a barrier under the Constitution to a state legislating an enforcement mechanism for Section 3 specific to federal officers. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The defendant appealed to the High court and Kerr J allowed the appeal on the basis that the claim was an abuse of process as it constituted an attempt to re-litigate issues previously determined and undermine the claimant’s criminal convictions. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
One can only speculate as to why the Supreme Court had re-listed the case several times. [read post]
