Search for: "In re AS"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 369,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2008, 11:59 am
WE'RE NUMBER ONE! [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions: Blogger complains of content re-post; From: [Individual] To: Google, Inc.Date: 2006-08-11 [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:11 pm
WHILE YOU'RE WAITING FOR HARRY POTTER, some other wizard reading. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 5:15 pm
WHERE WE'RE GOING, we won't even need lithium. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In In re Ness Tech., Inc. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:52 am
On April 20, 2012, the Nortel Networks UK Pension Trust Limited (the “Trustee”), as Trustee of Nortel Networks UK Pension Plan, and the Board of the Pension Protection Fund (the “Board,” together with the Trustee, the “Petitioners”) petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit’s ruling in In re Nortel Networks Inc., 669 F.3d 128 (3d Cir. 2011), that the “police power” exception to the automatic stay as set forth… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:35 pm
I am completely exhausted, and yet completely re-energized at the same time. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:47 am
I'm this obnoxious: Because, not only have I had a hand in forcing Rachel to create this website, I am now also forcing Rachel to draft a blog post on the whole harrowing experience, which post you'll be able to review right here . . . or there, and which post may be useful to you, if you're trying to revamp your own website. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:18 pm
The post Covid-19: New York City Courts to Re-Open appeared first on Clement Law. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:19 am
Everyone talks about, 'Oh, well you're going to pivot, you're going to.' I don't want to pivot. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:35 am
STATISTICS: “If you’re a member of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, you’re 3 times more likely to be a criminal than the general population.” [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:32 pm
When Jianping re-tweeted the message adding, “Charge, angry youth! [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:57 pm
See also In re Checking Account Overdraft Litig., No. 09-2036 (S.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
The court’s problem with Claimant’s request was that he did not show good cause for re-opening the action in abrogation of the court’s “sixty-day order. [read post]
IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, Zombie Prep As Disaster Prep. “If you’re ready for zombies, you’re ready for a…
24 May 2012, 11:00 am
. “If you’re ready for zombies, you’re ready for any disaster.” Some people think you should take a broader view. “”It’s funny and sometimes quasi-useful to read about zombie survival and all that, but in my humble opinion, zombies are not a viable focal point due to lack of reality.” [read post]
6 May 2022, 10:59 am
We’re looking for an experienced DevOps engineer to join our small team. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:18 pm
The Record gives a report on a first Office Action in the re-examination of a Visto patent asserted against RIM:Visto sued RIM last year, claiming RIM's BlackBerry e-mail system infringes on four Visto patents, including the one ruled on last week.RIM then requested re-examinations of the patents at the patent office.The patent preliminarily rejected last week had previously been challenged unsuccessfully by Seven Networks Inc. during that company's legal dispute with… [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:03 am
In In re Kaufman, the Appellate Division was asked to determine whether the Surrogate’s Court erred in suspending the letters of co-executors without an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:57 pm
(under the caption In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation), taking the occasion to expound on both the proper consideration of the evidence proffered to support an obviousness determination as well as the evidentiary burdens and their proper application. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:41 am
In re G (A Child) (Special Guardianship Order: Application for leave to apply to discharge) [2010] WLR (D) 32 “When a court was considering an application for leave to apply to discharge a special guardianship order pursuant to s 14D(5) of the Children Act 1989 it was important to adopt the correct approach to the question whether there had been a ‘change in circumstances’ for the purposes of that provision. [read post]
