Search for: "In v. United States" Results 2201 - 2220 of 102,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2018, 7:22 am by Docket Navigator
United States Endoscopy Group, Inc. et al, 7-13-cv-05669 (NYSD May 24, 2018, Order) (Roman, USDJ) [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:59 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), a case about the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule, there was an interesting blog debate... [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:22 am
United States, No. 05-9264: I have posted the decision online at this link. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:46 am by Immigration Prof
Supreme Court website In its Conference of January 15, 2016, the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the U.S. government's petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:32 pm by Phil
On August 24, 2010, Karl Bayer, Special Master, filed his Report and Recommendations to United States District Judge Sam Sparks regarding the construction of claims in United States Patent No.'s 6,514,640 and 5.910,382 in the Hydro-Quebec and The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:53 am by sally
Regina (New London College Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 856 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 129 “A sponsorship licence issued by the United Kingdom Border Agency to a business that was engaged in the provision of educational services to migrants from outside the European Economic Area constituted “possessions” within the meaning of article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:47 am by tracey
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening):[2012] UKSC 33;  [2012] WLR (D)  211 “Any requirement which, if not satisfied, would lead to an application for leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom being refused, was a rule ‘as to the practice to be followed’ in the administration of the Immigration Act 1971 and therefore had to be laid before Parliament… [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:15 am by EEM
News:Oral argument in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
  Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]