Search for: "John Doe V" Results 2201 - 2220 of 14,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
But we need not resolve whether the commentary together with the guideline suggests that the enhancement does not apply in this instance. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court is empowered to determine whether defendant is liable to pay no-fault benefits (see Marangiello v Kamak, 64 AD2d 624, 625 [1978]), and whether plaintiff is a proper person to pursue that claim "is an issue separate from the subject matter of the action or proceeding, and does not affect the court's power to entertain the case before it" (Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v Mastropaolo, 42 AD3d 239, 243 [2007]; see Matter of Renee XX.… [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 6:25 pm
Rarely does the Board issue a precedential interlocutory ruling, but it did so in Drive Trademark Holdings LP v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
A parent who does not know the child’s computer password doesn’t have apparent authority it consent to a search of the computer; rejecting United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:34 am by John L. Welch
The CAFC heard oral argument [mp3 here] yesterday in Mag Instrument, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:07 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
The justification, in other words, does not negate liability. [read post]