Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 40,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These problems can be avoided in large part through (i) greater awareness of the fundamental AI-related role of corporate governance (i.e., “the Why? [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:55 pm
But as even Crowell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:19 pm
From Sharper v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
” In Johns v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[22] Even if the commenter’s estimate is too high because the rule has been pared back from the proposal, the direct costs of disclosure are likely to be higher than the Commission’s estimated costs, such as the aggregate annual $16 million in professional costs for all affected filers.[23] Costs likely will be disproportionately high (and the benefits may be disproportionately low)[24] for investors in small public companies,[25] for which the Commission has provided only one… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:21 am
However, the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Adolph v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:19 am
We do not represent government, corporations or large business interests. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Waradzin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
As a large online marketplace, Redbubble’s response was reasonable. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 8:45 am
Schutte v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat 2. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
