Search for: "Long v State"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
A defendant’s physical presence in the state is not required, as long as his or her efforts were “ ‘purposely directed’ ” toward residents of that state. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
Various Coins; United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:16 am
Mayo v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:11 pm
FTC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:00 pm
Nahal Toosi of the Associated Press reports here on Long Island Care at Home v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:07 am
A federal jury found that the mistakes of James Moser in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 5:49 pm
As we all wait to hear what the Supreme Court decides to do with Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:38 am
And if you do that for a long enough period of time [without permission]… regardless of what a deed might say or what land records might say, you actually just become the owner. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:26 pm
Styers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 2:30 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Since assuming his new role, the number of states requesting an Article V convention has stagnated. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
Knick v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
But I do not see Powell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
Long. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 4:49 am
That could be lulling us into a false sense of optimism that the contingency agreement in Rhode Island will be struck down by that state's Supreme Court and that even if the ruling is appealed in County of Santa Clara, et al. v Atlantic Richfield Co., et al. our position will triumph. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:11 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court finally heard oral argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
The ruling states that criminal suspects who want to exercise the “right to remain silent” promised to them by Miranda v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
