Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2020, 8:16 am
Six months of confinement for violation of a condition of supervision; confinement may be imposed in three-month increments for technical violations. c. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:06 am
The Appellate Court was certain about the existence of trade mark infringement based on Article 9(2)(a) EUTM, double identity, in accordance with the case law of the CJEU (C-206/01 Arsenal case). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
Held in Côte d’Ivoire, the aim of the conference was to discuss IP issues an [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:43 am
The main purpose of the priority claim (at least in trade mark matters) is to provide the applicant with a “period of reflection to decide whether he wants also to submit an application for registration of a European Union trade mark for that mark and for goods and services identical to those in respect of which that mark is filed or contained within the latter” (General Court, T-82/14). [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 11:35 am
Council Directive 89/104 ... to be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark is being put to genuine use if it is used for goods (here: alcohol-free drinks) which the proprietor of the trade mark gives, free of charge, to purchasers of his other goods (here: textiles) after conclusion of the purchase contract? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
“) For a list of additional marks protected by U.S. statutes, see Appendix C of the T.M.E.P. here. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:42 pm
Supreme Court Mark S. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
“It feels very good,” Sterner said. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 3:58 am
They register these marks to extort money from legitimate brand owners. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
* Proprietor may be unhappy because BE HAPPY is not a trade markCan one be happy with a “BE HAPPY” trade mark? [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 4:03 am
In fact, I wonder whether making more decisions precedential would only confuse things.Section 2(a) - False suggestion of a connectionPrecedential No. 24: "PURPLE RAIN" for Dietary Supplements Falsely Suggests a Connection with Prince, Says TTAB Section 2(b) - Governmental Insignia: Precedential No. 19: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusals of Orange County "Unofficial" Insignia Section 2(c) - Consent of living individualPrecedential No. 36: TTAB Sustains Section… [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
” -- see Eleonora Rosati’s view on the important case Soulier and Doke, C-301/15. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:17 pm
It is not a personal attack from me upon Mark Leech. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
This is accomplished by alleging prior use of an identical trademark or of a mark that is similar to that of the subject mark and used with goods or services that are related to those goods or services identified in the Respondent’s application or registration. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 5:44 am
Next week will not be as good. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
In some cases a bill is marked "not negotiable". [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:44 am
Factor 1 which asks whether the defendant owns any trademark or other intellectual property in implicit in paragraph 4(c) of the Policy. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
These covers bore the marks ‘TM', ‘Copyright' and ‘all rights reserved'.At his trial for unauthorised use of a trade mark under sections 92(1)(c) and 101(5) of the 1994 Act it everyone agreed that Thomson had not obtained the authorisation of the trade mark holders. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:48 pm
Furey, 18 N.Y.3d at 287, 938 N.Y.S.2d 277, 961 N.E.2d 668 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
As usual the author is our good friend and colleague Alberto Bellan. [read post]
