Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 2201 - 2220 of 18,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2009, 5:33 am by Tom Lamb
The forum marks the 10th anniversary of the IOM study on medical errors and raises concerns about the lack of progress over the past decade in preventing medical harm. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:23 am
(Click here to read the decision.)The policy, issued by Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation to Mark and Barbara Landry, specifically excluded damage caused by flood. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm by Adela Laczynski
Adjacent waters that are “neighboring” are either: within 100 feet of the high-water mark; or within the 100-year floodplain and 1,500 feet of the high-water mark; or within 1,500 feet of the high-tide line. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 10:57 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
” Only applications for marks covering these medical products and services are eligible for this expedited procedure: Pharmaceutical products or medical devices such as diagnostic tests, ventilators, and personal protective equipment, including surgical masks, face shields, gowns, and gloves, that prevent, diagnose, treat, or cure COVID-19 and are subject to approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:20 am
Teeter, Serial No. 86359973 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark shown below, consisting of the color orange covering the exterior cylindrical surface of the goods except at serially spaced apart holes along the length of the goods, for "drip irrigation hose pulled by a center pivot or linear movement mobile irrigation system used by farmers and agricultural product producers to water crops growing on large agricultural fields," in view of a registration for the… [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 1:00 am
Part of the settlement is a substantial payment to the IPO which will cover some of our legal costs. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
 Thomas Hvammen Nicholson (Protector IP Consultants AS) brings a follow up to the blog post of 4 September, regarding Oslo Municipality’s attempt to obtain trade mark protection for the body of works of art of Norwegian artist Gustav Vigeland [also covered by IPKat here]. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 2:41 am by John L. Welch
As to the third-party registrations, only one (33139) covered clothing, but the Board saw no reason to deviate from PTO practice of registering such marks, absent a stronger showing by the PTO.Finally, the Board noted that the evidence was also insufficient to show a goods/place association with Chelsea, i.e., that Chelsea is associated with the production of clothing. [read post]
26 May 2024, 12:44 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Here is what she writes:By decision of 23 April 2024 the EUIPO refused to register a “smiley” to cover NFTs pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR.On 23 November 2023 The Smiley Company (the Applicant) filed the trade mark application no. 018953153 for a smiley face in classes 9 and 42 (NFT).The EUIPO confirmed the following conclusions raised by the Office on 19 December 2023.The relevant public would view the sign simply as a common smiley face, widely used as a graphic… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:42 am
Kluwer Trade Mark Blog’s case analysis is available here: Amphorae are not made of glass: really? [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
Examining Attorney Yat Sye Lee submitted internet evidence that some eighteen different companies offer the goods of both applicant and registrant under the same mark (including SEPHORA, BATH & BODY WORKS, and PACIFICA), along with twenty use-based third-party registrations covering these goods. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:31 am
This means various things: (i) anyone can attend, even if they are not registered for INTA (not a bad idea,given that IP blogs cover lots of topics that have nothing to do with trade marks),(ii) INTA doesn't have to worry about insuring it against fire, theft, death by misadventure or catering malfunction and (iii) you are unlikely to receive continuing legal education points for turning up. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:10 am by John L. Welch
Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc., Opposition No. 91188816 [Section 2(d) opposition to DOGZILLA  & Design for "dog toys" in view of the registered mark ZILLA for  "vivariums, terrariums, and aquariums for small animals; accessories for vivariums, terrariums, and aquariums, namely, tanks and artificial landscapes, stands, canopies, covers, hoods, air stones, aquarium fish nets" and for "pet food; pet treats." [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The zone of interests covers those who “allege an injury to a commercial interest in reputation or sales. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:28 am
Although the mark was not ultimately registered (an apparent hoax), gaming discussion forums across the internet exploded with speculation.In addition to trade marks, patents are also keenly monitored by enthusiasts. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 5:06 am
The latter comprised "a few use-based third-party registrations that cover both wine and fruits or vegetables under the same mark. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:16 am
It pointed to third-party registrations covering goods that purportedly violated the CSA. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:31 am by markshermanlaw
It’s a broad statute that covers any kind of excessive physical discipline. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:57 am
 By way of example, for trade marks:(2) Each of the following is a “permitted purpose”—(a) giving notice that a registered trade mark exists;(b) discovering whether, or by whom, a registered trade mark has been infringed by an act mentioned in section 21A(2)(a), (b) or (c);(c) giving notice that a person has a right in or under a registered trade mark, where another person’s awareness of the right is relevant to any proceedings that… [read post]