Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 2201 - 2220 of 9,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2008, 2:15 pm
Posner's use of the word "head" instead of "heads" in the following passage from that court's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am by Russell Beck
Arthur Andersen LLP, closing a loophole that had been opened and expanded by the United States District Courts in California, which had allowed the enforcement of noncompetes in certain circumstances. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:59 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
Tempnology, LLC N/K/A Old Cold LLC, involves this precise question and has made its way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am by christopher
Finally, it chides both sets of attorneys for failing to cite the United States Supreme Court case of DASTAR CORP. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:00 am
A designated smoking area:(i) must be located at least twenty (20) feet from any operable window or door used by the public of an indoor area of a multi-unit residence where smoking is prohibited;(ii) must not include, and must be at least twenty (20) feet from, outdoor areas primarily used by children including, but not limited to, areas improved or designated for play or swimming;(iii) must be no more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total outdoor area of the premises for which… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:30 pm
Second, Chris Wallace and Karl Rove on Fox News, desperate to find a silver lining in the public's wholesale rejection of Republican governance, loudly proclaimed throughout the night that the United States was still a center-right country, based on exit polls showing more voters who identified themselves as conservative than liberal. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]