Search for: "No. 337" Results 2201 - 2220 of 4,430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Term ‘patent troll’ is ‘commonly used and understood in patent litigation’ and need not be stricken from pleadings: Highland Plastics v Sorenson Research & Development (Docket Report) (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Situs of material events in false marking cases is where marking occurred: Simonian v Maybelline (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) ITC terminates investigation and issues limited exclusion… [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:34 pm by Jeralyn
From the New York Times: Business owners say Obama's jobs plan won't cause them to hire new workers. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am by Marie Louise
(WHDA) Openwave – Openwave files new 337 complaint against Apple and RIM regarding certain devices for mobile data communication (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Ars Technica) Oracle – Oracle v SAP – Oracle has until end of September to accept Hamilton J ruling to reduce damages (Tangible IP) Rambus – Hynix’ request to file amicus brief denied in Rambus appeal of re-exam (IPBiz) Richtek – ITC institutes formal enforcement proceeding in Certain DC-DC… [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:11 pm by Gregory Forman
Bauer, 287 S.C. 217, 337 S.E.2d 211, 212 (1985) (reversing family court’s 50/50 award of marital home and awarding marital home to wife, in part because of wife’s parents furnished down payment on home); Barr v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:29 pm by The Legal Blog
State of Karnataka, (2009) 16 SC 337, this Court observed that mere presence or association with other members alone does not per se be sufficient to hold every one of them criminally liable for the offences committed by the others unless there is sufficient evidence on record to show that each intended to or knew the likelihood of commission of such an offending act. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:07 am
For questions, contact Broussard & David at 1-888-337-2323 (toll free) or 337-233-2323 (local). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am by Marie Louise
OpticSale, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) OSRAM – ALJ Essex and ALJ Bullock deny motions to consolidate investigations 337-TA-784 and 337-TA-785 and ALJ Essex sets target date in Certain Light Emitting Diodes (337-TA-784) (ITC 337 Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) (ITC 337 Update) OSRAM – ALJ Rogers sets 17-month target date in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes (337-TA-798) (ITC 337 Law Blog) (ITC 337… [read post]