Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 12,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2016, 6:21 am
People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:51 am
The case, State of Missouri v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
I think the text is clear, but reasonable people may differ on this point. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
In Travis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:48 pm
These people are no threat to society and have proven so for decades. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
We are intimately familiar with the rules of evidence, both statutory and uncodified, and understand the rationale for the counterintuitive principle expressed in Browne v Dunn. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. (1977), the Court upheld the denial of a zoning permit for low-income housing, which had a disproportionate impact on Black people, again because the plaintiff couldn’t prove that there was a discriminatory purpose. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:57 pm
(It was probably for nil: if people know anything about this White House's environmental record, it is its record of denying climate change.) [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:09 pm
Few if any of these questions/issues are new, of course, but I'm curious to hear what people think. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Offering those people a pathway to parole will make our system more equitable,” said Gov. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:42 pm
Meraki Recovery Housing, LLC v City of Coon Rapids, 2021 WL 5567898 (D MN 11/29/2021) [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:57 am
As Dave has explained, the Supreme Court decision in Yemshaw v LB Hounslow brought the definition of violence in Housing Act 1996 into line with other statute and Government guidance, in particular with the accepted family law definition of ‘domestic violence’. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:26 am
Woodhull v. [read post]
