Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 3,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
The EEOC, the DOJ stressed, is not speaking for the United States and is not entitled to deference other than the Commission’s power to persuade. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:26 pm
Chandra v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:33 am
Here is the start of the abstract:In Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) I have been considering whistle blower statutes and the cultures they give rise to within structures of economic regulation in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:43 am
United States of America, No. 17-3132 (3d Cir. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 2:37 pm
Standard, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
United States, 424 U.S. 800, 817, 96 S. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The test is set out in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:08 pm
YouTube, Inc., No. 07-CV-2103 (S.D.N.Y. filed March 13, 2007); Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:50 am
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
The majority applied the Court’s recent New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
Blocking orders against ISPs to combat trade-mark infringement legal says Court of Appeal in Cartier
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
This duty is one which will, if necessary, be enforced in equity by way of injunction: see Upmann v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
MacDonald v PKT, Inc., 464 Mich 322 (2001). [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
