Search for: "Rules for Court Reporters"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 91,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
"Court rules judge correct to dismiss cold-medicine suit": This article appears today in The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:20 pm
"Kansas Court of Appeals splits on constitutionality of 'dismemberment' abortion ban; Shawnee County District Court ruling stopping the ban stands": Justin Wingerter of The Topeka Capital-Journal has this report. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 5:06 pm
” And Jack Rodgers of Courthouse News Service reports that “Detroit Isn’t the Only Place to Sue Ford, High Court Rules. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:10 am
" [para 33]When the case returned from Luxembourg, the Supreme Court ruled in compliance with the CJEU decision and found that the royalty could be paid by the buyer or the seller, or shared by them, as long as the artists’ rights were duly respected. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:04 am
Bauer We reported previously on the ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit striking down the part of the SEC’s conflict minerals rules that requires a registrant to describe its products as not “DRC conflict free” and upholding the remainder of the conflict minerals rules. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 6:42 pm
“Biden’s asylum restrictions for migrants may remain in place, federal appeals court rules”: Maria Sacchetti and Nick Miroff of The Washington Post have this report. [read post]
6 May 2021, 1:48 pm
” And Ben Winslow of Salt Lake City’s Fox 13 reports that “Utah Supreme Court rules on transgender rights and birth certificates. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:48 pm
"Court ruling on Whole Foods-Wild Oats deal reversed": Reuters provides a report that begins, "A U.S. appeals court reversed on Tuesday a lower court decision that allowed Whole Foods Market Inc's purchase of rival Wild Oats Markets Inc to proceed over the objections of antitrust authorities. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
The court needs to look at the facts, not draw arbitrary, bright-line rules. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court ruled unanimously on a retaliation ban limits case this week, that our Riverside labor and employment attorneys discussed in a recent blog, stating that a company can be sued for retaliation by terminating an employee's fiancée. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:58 pm
Last December, a judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] ruled [opinion] that the NSA's program is likely unconstitutional [JURIST report] after Larry Klayman, founder of the political advocacy group Freedom Watch [advocacy website], filed a lawsuit [JURIST report]... [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers is reporting: He has articles headlined "High court rules schools can curb student free speech"; "Campaign rules voided by Supreme Court"; and "Justices protect President Bush's faith-based initiatives. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:24 pm
"Scenarios: What Supreme Court ruling could mean for healthcare. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:48 am
” This rule reflects the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
"Appeals court overturns campaign finance rules": The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 6:22 pm
“Supreme Court ruling grants constitutional rights for Indigenous peoples outside Canada with ties to the land”: Sean Fine of The Toronto Globe and Mail has this report. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:47 pm
That Court determined that the CTA reporting requirements are likely unconstitutional and granted a preliminaryGo to Resource The post Department of Justice Files Notice of Appeal of Recent CTA Ruling appeared first on Altitude Community Law. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:27 am
Chuck Lindell writes, "Dismissal of Keller's rebuke stands, court rules," for the Statesman's own coverage. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 3:28 pm
A few judges in the Northern District of California have recently ruled on civil rights cases. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
And Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Supreme Court demands review of ruling in anti-illegal immigration case; A federal appeals court ruled that the anti-illegal immigration laws of Hazleton, Pa., clashed with federal authority; But the Supreme Court is telling the appeals court to reconsider the case. [read post]
