Search for: "STATE v. BROWN" Results 2201 - 2220 of 8,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am by Steve Sanders
He formerly practiced as a member of the Supreme Court and appellate group at Mayer Brown LLP, and represented twenty-three law and history professors as amici in Varnum v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am by Amy Howe
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm by Bill Ward
Kevin Brown, who has since moved from Long Branch, remain uncompensated. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am by Peter J. Sluka
Brown and Chiari in response denied that Capizzi was an equity partner with the power to dissolve BCLLP. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by Guadalupe Luna
In contrast the focus here centers on National Meat Association v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Image by Perzon SEO On September 19, 2017, the American Immigration Council in cooperation with Mayer Brown LLP, filed a lawsuit in federal district court on behalf of the National Venture Capital Association (National Venture Capital Association, et.al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Howard Friedman
A number of other claims were dismissed, including complaints that the chaplain rejected donated copies of the Qur'an and Muslim inmates were denied communal prayer on two mornings during Ramadan.In Browning v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
The story of how we got to Roe, like the story of how we got to Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Strassberg, Scrutinizing Polygamy: Utah’s Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm by Terry Lenamon
  Terry Lenamon’s List of Major United States Supreme Court Death Penalty Cases:Furman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
By a majority  (Lords Phillips, Brown and Rodger dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have lawfully been detained in any event did not affect the Secretary of State’s liability in false imprisonment. [read post]