Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 3,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I have no hesitation saying there ought to be state-law liability in such a circumstance: the burden of being wrong is on the commercial seller. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:20 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The Plaintiff Suffered Injuries After Being Rear-Ended by a Vehicle with Several Occupants The plaintiff in the case of Sellers v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:20 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The Plaintiff Suffered Injuries After Being Rear-Ended by a Vehicle with Several Occupants The plaintiff in the case of Sellers v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am by Sherica Celine
Updates to Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker (2024) (9 new Megas in August), Subchapter V Decision Tracker , Law Firm Rates Tracker (Debtor Professionals Mega Bankruptcies) , Debtor Professionals Mega Tracker , and DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker . [read post]