Search for: "State v. Drew"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 2,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2013, 8:29 am
But if you don't (or shouldn't) believe in your case, you'll most likely suffer a defeat, or a multi-year stay, and you might then be better off with a lay jury in a non-tech-savvy rural area.Next week the Düsseldorf Regional Court will decide on two more Huawei v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
These circumstances were paramount in the Court's reasoning that, considering the weak distinctive character of the earlier MAGNET 4 mark, the word MAGNET could be descriptive of the characteristics of the goods protected by the Spanish mark, in particular games and toys: it was common ground that magnets had been used for a long time in toys and that there was even a Commission Decision 2008/329 of 21 April 2008 which required Member States to impose the display of health… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
***Finally, for this year, I thought the Sixth Circuit's opinion in Hall v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
” With the Senate sitting as a court of impeachment, taking this oath in his current state of mind could place him in a precariousposition. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[No]Section 2(e)(2) - Primarily Geographically Descriptive:Precedential No. 22: TTAB Affirms Geographical Descriptiveness Refusal of HOLLYWOOD LAWYERS ONLINE for Online Referral ServicesSection 2(e)(3) - Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive:TTAB Affirms Section 2(e)(3) Refusal of KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE for CigarsSection 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname:TTAB Reverses Section 2(e)(4) Surname Refusal of ROMANÓV for Decorative EggsSection 2(f) - Acquired… [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Under no circumstances could an alleged violation of the right to be heard supply the parties with a means to put the EBA in a position where it is expected to check whether a board of appeal understood an argument correctly or drew the right conclusion from it. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm
Republicans in fact drew back from some of Alan Dershowitz’s more extreme assertions along this line. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
As United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
” Roadcap v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 4:16 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm
The first is BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
In Greenhouse v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
Earlier this month, His Honor Judge Hacon (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) issued his ruling in Fromageries Bel SA v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (Ch), confirming the 'Babybel cheese' 3D trade mark could not survive an application for a declaration of invalidity. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:28 pm
Details: Mega Brands America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
