Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 9,124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm
Rels. (1973) (stating the Supreme Court "has never held that all injunctions are impermissible" and noting that "[t]he special vice of a prior restraint is that communication will be suppressed … before an adequate determination that it is unprotected by the First Amendment"); Auburn Police Union v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:53 am
Gore, the court turned first to the sergeant’s contention the district court erred in finding his behavior was “extremely reprehensible. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 8:57 am
: Password-sharing is a “ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless” activity that “millions of people” engage in, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
On appeal, the First District reversed the trial court, holding that Mr. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
This is a great example of how a judicial system can benefit from having intermediate judicial review between a small-claims court and the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
The district court denied a TRO on June 11. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Republic of Philippines v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
District Court For The District Of Kansas Should Adopt The Ninth Circuit’s Approach When Applying The Kansas Anti-Slapp Law, 68 U. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:01 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Circuit’s 2013 opinion in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:27 pm
Upon being nominated and confirmed to the position of district judge, I conferred with staff at the Committee on Codes of Conduct for the Judicial Conference of the United States about recusal-related issues. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Oregon, which remains among the longest running federal district court cases in history. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:45 am
In reaching its decision, the Court cited United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:54 pm
As previously stated, the Supreme Court has made clear that the government may rescind DACA, if it complies with the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm
Following this apparent defiance of the Supreme Court’s ruling, a federal district court issued a decision explicitly stating that the Administration must restore DACA to its pre-September 2017 status, which means accepting new applications. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Leopold v US No.18-5276, an investigative court reporter applied to the district court to unseal various court orders relating to electronic surveillance. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Most of these were anonymous, but the first phone call revealed Scardina’s name on the caller-identification screen on Phillips’s phone. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
The government referenced Vasquez v. [read post]
