Search for: "State v. Force" Results 2201 - 2220 of 32,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm by Nassiri Law
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
The petition seeks review of CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Citron
  Instead, the federal government makes and administers federal laws without forcing the states to do some of the work for them. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Many of these products are smuggled from China, with one source estimating that Chinese counterfeiters produce 400 billion cigarettes per year to meet international demand.[11] Global focus on counterfeit cigarettes has forced the criminals to innovate. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645 page e-book addresses the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions, to be considered in a layoff of personnel in the event of a reduction of force by the State of New York as the employer and its political subdivisions. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645 page e-book addresses the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions, to be considered in a layoff of personnel in the event of a reduction of force by the State of New York as the employer and its political subdivisions. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm by Thomas Surmanski
He continued to state that once such a declaration is made the “offending section ceases to exist and is of no force and effect. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:59 pm
On 19 January, CAAF granted review in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:24 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
On 10 December 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered the judgment for the case of Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18), finding that the UK is free to revoke unilaterally the notification of its intention to withdraw from the EU. [read post]