Search for: "State v. Gross" Results 2201 - 2220 of 4,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am by Andrew Delaney
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kennedy joined, dissented (Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:08 am by David DePaolo
"The Hartford, the workers' compensation carrier for defense contractor JT3 on Edwards Airforce Base, lost an appeal before the 2nd District Court of Appeals, which concluded that the undisputed facts in Schultz v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
”   Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:35 am by Joy Waltemath
In contrast, there was “surely room for debate” as to whether the disclosures by the plaintiff in this case about the failures of ACIS were significant enough to fall within several of the types of disclosures protected under the WPA, including gross mismanagement, gross waste of public resources, abuse of authority, or violation of law, the D.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:54 am by David DePaolo
The WCJ ruled that LeBoeuf was inapplicable to Dahl.Following the 1st DCA's 2011 decision in Ogilvie v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
A few of those are as follows: In the closely watched matter of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 8:26 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the court, on reconsideration, granted summary judgment to his employer (Dade v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by SHG
People v Tims, 449 Mich 83, 95, 99, 103-104; 534 NW2d 675 (1995). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
” Judge Gallo found that the Defendant “failed to preserve multiple documents that are relevant to Plaintiff’s claims with the requisite culpable state of mind to support a finding of spoliation of evidence”. [read post]