Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 173,854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 10:52 am
Synder v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
" As Alito notes, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:47 am
Given the legal framework, negligence in motor vehicle operation includes distractions such as cell phone use, which is prohibited by law while driving. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
In Sparf v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:06 am
In a distracted driving case, the claimant was involved in an accident with a state-owned van. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:43 am
From an originalist perspective, NLRB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:31 am
In Elmagin Capital, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
I’ve been following Snyder v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:44 am
(J.L. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
I have chosen these three because they reflect broader patterns in Trump’s agenda: each would be enormously consequential, directly attacking at least several hundred thousand long-time residents of the United States; each would exploit pre-existing weaknesses in the immigration enforcement regime that render it susceptible to actors interested in undermining the rule of law; and each would sow fear throughout immigrant communities, even if it does not “succeed”… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Matter of Gallante v DiNapoli 2024 NY Slip Op 03370 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Matter of Gallante v DiNapoli 2024 NY Slip Op 03370 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:33 am
Federal law, the court writes, “leaves it to state and local governments to regulate gratuities to state and local officials. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:23 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Uphold a law if it is a good idea; strike it down if it is not. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
That paraphrasing of his decision in Schenck v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
The AD1 suggested, however, that on remand the Civil Court could apportion the rent suspension to exclude such portion(s) of the premises that had been used for storage.They sure took that taking that seriously.# # #DECISIONMatter of 195BO LLC v A., Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Several state supreme courts have since followed the Supreme Court’s example, finding their state antitrust laws are inapplicable to baseball. [read post]