Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 29,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2014, 8:06 am
The Village annexed the relevant parcels by Local Law No. 3 (2006) of the Village, which was filed with the Secretary of State in December 2006. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm
Saada v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:58 pm
Thomas (09-1161), which challenges certain state-law usury claims against banks, and Norfolk Dredging Company v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Kastroll v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 9:55 am
Marc Stern, AJCongress general counsel, said AJCongress did not participate because they believe that in light of recent precedents allowing greater church-state interaction the challenge to city funding will be unsuccessful. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:36 pm
Town of Hallie v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:22 pm
The court has redefined what it means to be unreasonable: rather than looking into whether the interference was unreasonable in light of the community standard and duration of the interference, the court has adopted Justice LaForest's formulation of the test from a case in which he was merely concurring (Tock [Tock v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In Polo v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:08 am
Kenneth Johnson and Strunk & Assoc., revisits the Court’s 1994 decision in Light v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
; (2) Does such a person in any event remain subject to the legislation of the UK in the light of Point 19(c) of the UK’s annex VI to the Regulation? [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:03 am
SENTENCING United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 12:05 pm
United States Miranda: J.D.B. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
With the Court’s December sitting having concluded, coverage is light. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 7:14 am
Just this week, the Supreme Court decided an important conflict of laws question in Cassirer v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
RBS Citizens, N.A. (7th Cir.2012) 667 F.3d 900, 908–910judgment vacated and matter remanded for further reconsideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Case citation: US v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
In a memo opinion, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the non-FOSTA claim dismissals and remanded the FOSTA claim for reconsideration in light of the Ninth Circuit’s Doe v. [read post]
