Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 2201 - 2220 of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 6 March, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Lord Advocate (representing the Taiwanese Judicial Authorities & Anor) v Dean (Scotland). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
The appeal was made before the House of Lords judgment in Doherty was handed down and was amended as a result. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:07 am by Giles Peaker
The Judge acknowledged the impact on Mr R, but referenced the words of Lord Sumption JSC in Solihull Metropolitan Council v Hickin (2012) UKSC 39 “Any system of statutory protection which deals with interests as varied as residential tenancies and depends for its practical operation on the accidents of cohabitation, matrimonial break-up and death will inevitably give rise to anomalies at the margins. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Howard Knopf
The UK Supreme Court (which was formerly known by that most illustrious of legal trademarks as the “House of Lords”) has just rendered an extraordinarily important judgment in Lucas v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Patricia’s daughter continues in her declaration to state what anyone would have to agree is the obvious. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 November 2019 Warby J handed down a judgment in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers [2019] EWHC 2947 (QB) finding that a MailOnline article made a defamatory allegation against the claimant, a Conservative Member of the House of Lords. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Lords Landing Village Condo., 360 Md. 462, 476, 758 A.2d 1008, 1016 (2000) (citing Gittings v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Lords Landing Village Condo., 360 Md. 462, 476, 758 A.2d 1008, 1016 (2000) (citing Gittings v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am by Rosalind English
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
The rule of law objection to vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned: “Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Turning to free speech issues, the Court struck down state laws that banned ads featuring the price of beer and other alcoholic beverages in 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 2:54 am by INFORRM
Settlement was also reached with Prince Harry’s co-claimant Lord Tom Watson, former Labour deputy leader, for “unwarranted intrusion. [read post]