Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm
” Dieter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
STATE V. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:53 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:01 pm
Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc. (10th Cir., November 7, 2017) (affirming dismissal of Rael's state law harassment and emotional distress claims as preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act)Discrimination/Retaliation*Mitchell v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:31 pm
National Science Foundation (10th Cir., April 26, 2017) (denying Craine's petition for review: his disclosures, as a former employee of Kansas State University, did not fall within the whistleblower protections of 41 U.S.C. ss. 4712)*Jackson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:54 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 7:22 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
’ State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:33 am
Image via CrunchBaseTrial is slated for April 22 in Timelines, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:45 am
ShutEmDown Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
In Matal v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Optari’s competitor, Lubber, Inc., stated a plausible false marking claim by alleging that Optari placed the patent pending mark on the bottom of the tote in an effort to lead the public into believing that the tote itself was undergoing patent review, the court determined.The false marking statute (35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:49 pm
The court’s ruling in Nafeesa Syeed v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 77 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
