Search for: "State v. Waters"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 9,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2007, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
In any event, the court in the case of the day went on to refuse to vacate the award, holding that the arguments advanced by the seamen did not hold water. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:08 am
Francis was the special master during the negotiations that led to the 1985 consent decree in the United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Specifically, EPCA says that “no State [or local] regulation concerning the energy efficiency, energy use, or water use, of [a] covered product shall be effective with respect to such covered product. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:04 pm
In State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:35 pm
In Seung v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Bill of Rights declares the fundamental rights of residents to clean air and water, and to protect the rights of nature. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 8:57 am
On June 1, 2022, the Sixth District Court of Appeal, in response to a request for publication, ordered that its previously unpublished May 9, 2022 opinion in Committee for Sound Water and Land Development v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:01 am
Here they are, more amicus curiae briefs in n Koontz v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
The January 2011 North Carolina Court of Appeals case of White v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:48 am
Stanger is one of the vets sickened by exposure to sodium dichromate at the Qarmat Ali Water Treatment Plant. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 7:29 am
In Pozzi Window Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:12 pm
(See Murphy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Hickerson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Hickerson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:08 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:55 pm
Strauss Water Ltd., C.A. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
