Search for: "Sunday v State" Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2022, 11:13 am by Gene Takagi
May help for state law (e.g., property tax exemption) and fundraising purposes. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm by Diane Levin
In fact, I wonder what John Adams would have made of a Supreme Court decision like Scott v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 8:01 am by JURIST Staff
” Those were expected to arrive Sunday morning, just in time to aggravate Convoy-weary local residents and police. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:21 am
(Interesting advance note on that upcoming report: the CIO of the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System is a Commission Member; SERS has been lead plaintiff in a number of securities actions, including against CIGNA Corp. and Royal Dutch/Shell Transport, as they then were.) [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:17 am by Fiona de Londras
First of all, of course, there is nothing objectionable about insisting that state-provided healthcare would deliver value in terms of decreasing waste, increasing productivity and quality of healthcare etc… That is not, however, what it appears to me that Cllr. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:24 am
For example, in the case of Brookview Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:13 am by Matthew Scarola
Supreme Court will decide whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state-law rulings that class-action bans are unconscionable. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
” The court also found it irrelevant that the churchgoers ostensibly felt coerced by their pastor—who recruited them from the pulpit every Sunday— into volunteering their labor, as the DOL had argued, since “spiritual coercion” is not in the agency’s domain, a concurring opinion explained (Acosta v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]