Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT" Results 2201 - 2220 of 5,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
The study uses data provided by Lex Machina (which also provided data for a US Government Accountability Office study on the same issue - a comment based on the GAO's data can be found here), a company which specialises in collecting and analysing IP litigation data (founded by Professor Mark Lemley at Stanford University). [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Speakers are Jonathan Gienapp, Gautham Rao, Rachel Shelden, and Thomas Wolf. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:00 am by Brooke
"On H-Net is a review of Karine V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:32 pm
 Showing no faith in the political process, as they exhibited yesterday in King v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
Until just recently we missed quite a symposium on Native American Law in the Modern Era in the Albany Government Law Review 10:1. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
The government's appellate lawyer told us that the prosecutor's superior would give her a talking-to. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Good (2008) 555 U.S. 70 (2008) (dissenting opinion) – all joined by Roberts, CJ, and Scalia, Thomas & Alito, JJ.] [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Contreras 15-58Issue: (1) Whether the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness standard requires that a suspect threaten a police officer with a weapon before the police officer can use deadly force to apprehend the suspect, or whether Tennessee v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Maryland arising from the government's failure timely to turn over cell phone records prior to trial. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
ANL did not object to the adjournment, but urged that any new trial date should be as soon as possible given Thomas Markle’s increasing ill health. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm by Jeffrey McCoy and Oliver Dunford
” Indeed, rulemaking was explicitly listed as a “significant authority” when that term was first used by the Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]