Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 2201 - 2220 of 11,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2021, 12:32 pm by Bridget Russell and Andrea Feathers
  Parties should be cognizant when including a Delaware choice of law provision that doing so will not bar California securities law claims unless the plaintiff could instead plead a Delaware securities law claim, and such a provision may also be ineffective at barring claims based on other states’ securities laws as well. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A background in journalism or other work involving similar skills or experience is a plus; … California bar membership or application to join California bar pending results of recent bar examination; Preference for one or more years of legal experience working in the relevant legal areas, such as in a judicial clerkship, law firm, or non-profit organization…. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm by Jon Ibanez
The California Supreme Court in the case of Mercer v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm by Jon Ibanez
The California Supreme Court in the case of Mercer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Many states have legislation on the books that insulates non-manufacturing intermediate sellers from strict liability. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:12 am by Mark Murakami
  National Cases with Potential Impacts in Hawaii Right to Enter Statutes -  Virginia statute not a facial taking, here; California statute pends with California courts here. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:39 pm by Susan Ross (US)
A September 1, 2016 ruling from a New York State appeals court may demonstrate important differences between New York and California law governing publicity rights. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:39 pm by Susan Ross (US)
A September 1, 2016 ruling from a New York State appeals court may demonstrate important differences between New York and California law governing publicity rights. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:20 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
New York now has similar provisions in its laws barring NDAs in settlements and other resolutions of sexual harassment disputes. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:28 am by Mike
The California Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit members of the bar from misleading the judiciary through any false statement of fact or law. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  As stated, for example, a misrepresentation that goods were “union made” would arguably be excluded from §43(a)(1)(B) coverage. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Chicago, the Court held that the Second Amendment applies to the states. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:09 am by Jon Brodkin
"First, the Court concludes that the Commission has not shown legal authority to issue its Preemption Directive, which would have barred states from imposing any rule or requirement that the Commission 'repealed or decided to refrain from imposing' in the Order or that is 'more stringent' than the Order. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am by Spencer Persson
In single defendant cases, it could also push class action matters to states where the defendant is unquestionably a citizen, and away from preferred jurisdictions favored by the plaintiffs’ bar, like California. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 6:47 am
" The Supreme Court late Friday night lifted California’s restrictions on religious gatherings in private homes, saying they could not be enforced to bar prayer meetings, Bible study classes and the like.... [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
The Nordyke case also could put before the Justices another issue that Heller did not settle: what did the Supreme Court mean when it suggested that the Second Amendment would allow government to bar “the carrying of firearms in sensitive places. [read post]