Search for: "United States v. Lee" Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
  Citing more cases from the 19th Century than an opinion by Justice Scalia, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 5:26 am
: Microsoft v i4i (IPKat) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Copyright When pirates become copyright cash cows (TorrentFreak) Can copyright save the newspaper industry? [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:15 pm
The American Civil Liberties Union represents al-Kidd in the case, al-Kidd v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:12 am
Introduction In Part III (here) we examined the background of Stolt-Nielsen and identified four issues that the United States Supreme Court will likely confront when it decides the case. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 10:27 am
United States:   To be "necessary and proper" the means must be more than rationally related to the end, they must  be "plainly adapted" to that end. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:52 am
Evid. 803(6) and United States v Catabran, 836 F.2d 453, 457 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]