Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 12:57 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
Professor Calandrillo and his co-author provided a history of daylight saving time, examined empirical data from 1974 when the United States experimented with year-round daylight saving time, and argued that a cost-benefit analysis indicated that the United States should adopt daylight saving time year-round. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 1:51 pm
Three separate opinions in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:22 am
"); United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:58 am
United States Magistrate Judge Leonard P. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm
United States, the Court has been again asked to interpret the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, in a recent case, McQuistion v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
On February 22, 2023, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Dapper Labs’ motion to dismiss, holding that although “it is a close call and the Court’s decision is narrow,” Moments NFTs qualify as securities under the Howey test, the four-pronged test created by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 pm
Both ERJ and LMB erroneously believed that Cambodian children could not be adopted in the United States. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
The litigants in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:08 am
In Microsoft Corporation v USA (2nd.Cir. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
United States, 357 U.S. 480 (1958). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:25 am
” This opinion concerns transfers to foreign countries, not the United States. [read post]
