Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 2201 - 2220 of 14,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Renee Lerner
One would be hard pressed to argue that their civil justice systems are worse than that of the United States. [read post]
While the claims before the Federal Court were not in relation to Commonwealth or State government orders during the latest Delta outbreak, her Honour noted that unlike the United Kingdom, where COVID-19 outbreaks were “so widespread” and virtually everywhere, Australia was a large and sparsely populated country with far fewer COVID-19 cases. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices agreed to consider whether a prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses can trigger the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am by Cinthia Macie
  In this respect, European merger control law reflected U.S. antitrust law at or around the time of United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the state-action doctrine in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief preview of the most closely-watched cases: Hemphill v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  That’s the tough lesson that an LLC member facing termination of his membership status learned in Costello v Molloy et al., 73 Misc 3d 1206(A) [Sup Ct 2021]. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:30 pm by Mark Movsesian
As Zalman Rothschild shows in a forthcoming study, judicial disagreements about Covid restrictions in the United States have closely tracked judges' partisan identities. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Michael's, a non-profit organization, "is a vocal critic of the mainstream Catholic Church," including the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops ("USCCB"). [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:56 am by Ronald Mann
Although they are paid as civilian employees, they routinely wear military uniforms and are obligated to maintain membership with an appropriate rank in the state National Guard where they are located, which carries with it (by law) membership in the Army National Guard of the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Source: Methodology derived from Council on State Taxation, “50-State Study and Report on Telecommunications Taxation,” May 2005; updated July 2021 from state statutes, FCC data, and local ordinances by Scott Mackey, Leonine Public Affairs LLP, Montpelier, VT. [read post]