Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 2201 - 2220
of 49,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
International Court of Justice: South Africa v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, declared Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm
Greenwood, --- S.Ct. ----, 2012 WL 43514 (1/10/12) the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) considered whether the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:02 pm
Two opinions came down today from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the Commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
The Harris v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:13 am
CROSS-POSTED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER PAYMENT The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:36 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 6:44 pm
Via the Disputing blog, which we have added to our blogroll, we were led to this week's United States Supreme Court arbitration law decision in Hall Street v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 6:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:40 am
Kimes, 246 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2001) and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:30 pm
United States 17-1090 Issues: (1) Whether the takings clause applies to the decisions of federal courts, and, if so, under what circumstances may federal courts review and remedy federal judicial takings claims; and (2) whether the Court of Federal Claims may adjudicate federal judicial takings claims against the United States when the remedy sought is just compensation and not invalidation of another federal court’s decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Recently, in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
