Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 2201 - 2220 of 29,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
This would be a truth-seeking mission as well as a public service, showing the American people just how corrupt some justices are. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:34 pm by Zachary Spilman
His partial dissent begins with quotes from a case found in the first volume of the Military Justice reporter: Courtney v. [read post]
With this ruling, the Supreme Court justices have sent a very strong message to those would be rogues: “lie to the court at your peril”. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:09 am by Bart Torvik
” This Court, however, concludes that this limitation would prevent the rest of the Act from working as well as hoped. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm by Adam Feldman
Without O’Connor’s vote in support of abortion’s legality, for instance, the court very well might have overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:19 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
City of New York, the court heard arguments in its first major gun control case since District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:01 pm by Ronald Mann
Wednesday morning the justices got a rare opportunity to ponder basic principles of tort law, as they closed the October session with the argument in Air and Liquid Systems v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am by Charon QC
COMMENT It would appear that Lord Justice Waller is being kept busy by the children of England. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm by Liskow & Lewis
Like the final season of ABC’s hit series Lost, the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, American jurisprudence lost an intellectual giant. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
Neither justice mentions In re Gault, the 1967 Arizona case the Supreme Court agreed to hear exactly one week after announcing Miranda v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Even if the Court views file-sharing lawsuits as unwise and the statutory penalties a remarkably poor policy judgment, the objectives sought by this suit are well within those contemplated by Congress and the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. s. 101 et seq. [read post]