Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 2201 - 2220 of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In the Court’s words, “[u]nless it has that effect on her right of choice [creating a substantial obstacle], a state measure designed to persuade her to choose childbirth over abortion will be upheld if reasonably related to that goal. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Jennifer Beckett in the Hoot has commented that the media “dangerously misuses the word ‘trolling’. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
In other words, any restriction upon a type of campaign speech that is equally available to challengers and incumbents tends to favor incumbents. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
about 13 hours ago from TweetDeck @bschorr Would be nice it were a right-click option - many need to do this constantly while editing.about 13 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to bschorr RT @bschorr: Word Tip: SHFT+F5 to go back to last place in doc u were editing. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am by Peter Mahler
The first is CTNY Investors 3, LLC v DME CRE Opportunity Fund I LP, 2014 NY Slip Op 30268(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 29, 2014], decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am by Florian Mueller
Note that the reasons for the two occurrences of the word "preliminary" in the previous sentence are independent of each other: the term "preliminary reference" describes the presentation of questions of EU law to the bloc's top court by a national court regardless of whether such reference occurs in connection with preliminary injunctions or (which is almost always the case) in a full-blown proceeding just prior to final judgment. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am by Peter Mahler
Not according to Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla whose decision last month in Yu v Guard Hill Estates, LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 32008(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 15, 2018], dismissed a minority member’s claim for judicial dissolution of two family-owned, realty-holding LLCs under Section 702 of New York’s LLC Law. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am by Howard Knopf
….[22] Although the Consortium argued that this finding was based on the weight given to the evidence by the Board, a matter with which this Court should not lightly intervene, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the Board, through oversight, overlooked the expert evidence and submissions it accepted as exhibits AC-114 and AC-114A on December 5, 2014. [23] The Board’s clear wording that Access provided no evidence rebuts the presumption that a… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am by Howard Knopf
….[22] Although the Consortium argued that this finding was based on the weight given to the evidence by the Board, a matter with which this Court should not lightly intervene, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the Board, through oversight, overlooked the expert evidence and submissions it accepted as exhibits AC-114 and AC-114A on December 5, 2014. [23] The Board’s clear wording that Access provided no evidence rebuts the presumption that a… [read post]