Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND" Results 2221 - 2240 of 2,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Texas: JMOL rulings – damages experts, future royalties, JMOL standards, obviousness, etc: Soverain v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm by Eric Talley
Similarly, Delaware courts have recently manifested a renewed willingness to whittle away at governance-related fiduciary duties (sometimes known as Blasius duties) that are a favorite and oft-utilized weapon of hedge funds and pension funds alike (see, e.g., the recent Barnes and Noble decision from Vice Chancellor Strine – Yucaipa v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by Russell Korobkin
(Russell Korobkin) Yesterday’s opinion by District Court Judge Royce Lamberth enjoining federal funding of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research sent shockwaves throughout the medical research community. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
., will pay a $15,000 civil penalty and spend at least $45,000 on a supplemental project to help clean local high school laboratories of hazardous waste, as part of a settlement with EPA Region 7 over hazardous waste management issues at the university’s Danforth and School of Medicine campuses. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
Originally Published October 14, 2009 Introduction  Nowadays, background checks of prospective employees are the rule, not the exception. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: Why is an amendment necessary? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
BOTTICELLA (IPBiz) US Patent Reform Comments on the USPTO strategic plan (Article One Partners) An update on USPTO’s FY 2010 spending authority (Director’s Forum) (IPBiz) The slippery Manager’s Amendment to S.515 (IPBiz) Michel & Nothhaft: Inventing our way out of joblessness (Patently-O) US Patents First patent granted in the US (Securing Innovation) IV officially not in trouble,ish! [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It's in the Sixth Amendment and in Section 10, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
In particular, the Court summarized some of the key factual background as follows: With the DLJ-affiliated directors making up a majority of the Insilco board, the board allegedly managed Insilco in such a way that benefitted DLJ to the detriment of Insilco. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:43 am by Steve Schultze
The 4th Circuit delivered a double-whammy to Virginia: not only did it uphold the district court's ruling that Ostergren's site warranted First Amendment protection, it ruled that the protection should extend even further than the district court had ruled. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
The company must also conduct additional monitoring and reporting of stormwater discharges, hire personnel certified in stormwater management to oversee compliance with stormwater permits, and provide training in stormwater management for all operational employees. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by Anthony Lake
” Judge Zagel rules that no “twittering” is allowed in the courtroom. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:26 am by charonqc
What gave any of you the idea that a 1959 Act which did not amend the 1751 Act, or repeal it, could be overlooked? [read post]