Search for: "Application of Stevens" Results 2221 - 2240 of 4,212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am by Chloe Dickson (Bristows)
  Applicants should also consider whether their evidence in support of an Arrow declaration sufficiently addresses the effect the patentee’s portfolio of applications is having in creating real and significant doubt and which is hampering commercial plans. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
“RFRA requires the Government to demonstrate that the compelling interest test is satisfied through application of the challenged law ‘to the person’ — the particular claimant whose sincere exercise of religion is being substantially burdened. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Stefanie Levine
  Stevens’ concurrence considered this balance by asking “whether a patent monopoly is necessary to ‘motivate the invention. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:24 pm
No. 6,427,068, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am by Michael Risch
Indeed, though the concurrence doesn't provide a great solution, Justice Stevens rightly points out that the majority opinion does nothing to help identify abstract ideas. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
Raimondo, 22-451Issues: (1) Whether, under a proper application of Chevron v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
In dissents disguised as concurrence, Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor would have categorically rejected business methods as patentable subject matter. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:08 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  So Steven was the applicant in this case and really all the parties agreed that Ida was incapable. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:08 am by Juan C. Antúnez
I was particularly happy to have found that Justice Stevens’ opinion because it describes exactly the mischief which would be created by the retroactive application of later-developed due process principles to reopen closed adoption cases. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:45 am by Steve Hall
Justice John Paul Stevens and Anthony Kennedy dissented, with Stevens saying he cannot see why Wood's lawyer did not investigate or present "powerful mitigating evidence of Wood's mental deficits for the penalty phase" of the trial. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
City of Chicago, holding in favor of a group of African Americans who claimed that a discriminatory use of an application test kept them from being hired as firefighters by the city. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
" This, the Court concluded, would be worse than the typical application of § 5 (under the Supremacy Clause) to prevent the application of a state law that conflicts with federal law. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
The school’s practice of allocating 16 of its 100 seats to underrepresented minority applicants was ruled unconstitutional by Justice Lewis Powell, who wrote the controlling opinion. [read post]