Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am
The Court found compelling the fact that the officers sought and obtained approval from a police superior and deputy district attorney, and that a magistrate had approved the warrant. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Knorr v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm
Pickett’s action that included a Private Attorney General Act (Lab. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:24 pm
V. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 10:12 am
In 1996, the California State Supreme Court in Burgess v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
The procedures are generally the same as the old interference law, including its odd timing requirements. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
General Scope of the Attorney-Client Privilege Both state and federal law protects certain communications between attorneys and clients. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:57 pm
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal.4th 969, 986.) [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
Superior Court (2004) 119 CA4th 1181 (pdf). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
Superior Court (Zaharias), 21 Cal. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
For example, in his argument to the Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Superior Court, 134 Cal. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:35 pm
The case in question, Parker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:44 am
The court in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:30 am
The spouse must file a caveat or lawsuit in Superior Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:46 am
Blancato, who was the plaintiffs' attorney, observed that the 17% annual interest rate on the loans might be usurious under General Obligations Law § 5-501 and Banking Law § 14-a, which generally fix the maximum annual interest rate which may be charged for these types of transactions at 16%. [read post]
