Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 2,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 5 November 2019 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Hemming v Baker [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB). [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
” Almost 16 years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada highlighted the importance of written reasons in administrative decisions (Baker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jose Alfredo Brena v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am
’ …” he nevertheless undertook a review of other potential grounds of continuing entitlement, noting trial and appellate authority supporting the proposition that the phrase “other cause” in the Divorce Act’s definition of “child of the marriage” is to be interpreted broadly (see Baker v Baker, (1994) 2 RFL (4th) 147 (ABQB), Gamache v Gamache, 1999 ABQB 313 and Olson v Olson, 2003 ABCA 56). [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
.), in today's Hermes Int'l v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:55 am
Has enough time passed since the joy of Obergefell v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 10:26 am
I have successfully convinced several of my clients to accept the medication being recommended in many Baker Act cases. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
Baker, 876 F.2d 456 (5th Cir. 1989). [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 This is an odd case, in lots of ways, but what is decided in this appeal to the Court of Appeal is potentially of broader significance and certainly useful as clarification. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
And, in State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
Div. 1997) (stating “[u]nder the probable intent doctrine, New Jersey courts construe wills to ‘ascertain and give effect to the probable intention of the testator’”) (quoting Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm
Baker, Ask a Director, 24 AALL Spectrum 30 (2019). 4. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 4:08 am
Giving the employer's counsel unbridled access to ex parte communications with an employee's treating physicians would create numerous potential dangers, as noted in Baker [Baker v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
"); Baker v. [read post]
