Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 2221 - 2238 of 2,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
He argued several times, that breaking the law regarding meal periods was like a victimless crime. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Tollen shared his time with Steven Drapkin, counsel for amicus curiae California Employment Law Council. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:56 pm
Today, California’s Fair Employment & Housing Commission (FEHC) adopted revisions to the state’s AB 1825 sexual harassment training regulations. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 3:55 am
Today, California’s Fair Employment & Housing Commission (FEHC) adopted revisions to the state’s AB 1825 sexual harassment training regulations. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:54 pm
However, due to preemption by federal law, civil union partners and domestic partners have no legal basis to claim spousal benefits from non-governmental employers, but such employers can extend benefits voluntarily, subject to the adverse tax consequences imposed by federal law. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 7:02 am
Your credit file is off limits to potential lenders, insurers and even potential employers. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 11:06 am
Today, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) requested changes to the AB 1825 regulations adopted by California’s Fair Employment & Housing Commission (FEHC) on November 14, 2006. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:51 am
Today, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) requested changes to the AB 1825 regulations adopted by California’s Fair Employment & Housing Commission (FEHC) on November 14, 2006. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:42 pm
Rather, the Supreme Court favored the trial court's procedure - contact information would be disclosed unless the putative class member objected to the disclosure by returning the letter sent by the parties, checking a box denying consent to disclosure.The Pioneer case is not an employment law decision per se; the case involved claims that a Pioneer DVD player was defective. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
"  He is also a blogger, and you should check out his Employment Law Blog. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:03 am
The sweeping mandate and detailed requirements for training, set to go into effect in early 2007, have prompted employment lawyers to warn clients with California staff that ignoring the mandate could be held against them in any future employment litigation. Visit the Employment Law Practice Center • SUBSCRIPTION REQUIRED Legal Tech Expert E-Mails His Wish List to Santa Law Technology News … [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 4:19 pm
A letter brief joining in the request for review was filed on Dollar Tree's behalf by the California Employment Law Council, an employment defense organization headed by the law firm of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 1:45 pm
In March 2006, the Study Group held public roundtable discussions in Los Angeles, California, and Washington, D.C., and requested written comments on issues relating to general eligibility for the section 108 exceptions, as well as preservation and replacement copying. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 9:50 pm
Law Judge Mary Miller Cracraft issued her decision Dec. 15, 2000. *** U-Haul Co. of California (32-CA-20665-1; 346 NLRB No. 34) Fremont, CA June 8, 2006. [read post]
14 May 2006, 5:01 pm
Yet none pursue black-letter law as well as McCoy. [read post]