Search for: "Clarence T."
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2025, 8:24 am
” Justice Clarence Thomas repeatedly expressed concerns about the lack of any limits or constraints on the program’s ability to raise revenue. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 11:15 am
” The state “didn’t have good reason to draw this district,” Gorsuch insisted. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Their ballots won’t cut prices at the pump or what they pay for groceries. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
” We can’t wait to see its tan when it gets back from its vacation. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:17 am
H.R. 4840 – To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1979 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, as the “Clarence D. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
” I didn’t ask you that,” snapped Ginsburg. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:38 pm
Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas—the two justices most sympathetic to the states—repeatedly characterized social media content moderation as "censorship. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:43 am
Justice Clarence Thomas questioned where New York draws the line between higher- and lower-density areas. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
We didn’t do it. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:43 am
Clarence Thomas. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But he didn’t give up. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 1:40 am
Can’t she quit the ticket already? [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:49 pm
I don't want you to riot. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 1:19 pm
I won't try to assess the purely statutory issues in this case. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:40 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, for example, asked, “At what point should we determine … whether or not there is merger? [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:29 am
And maybe they won’t. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
” Among the remaining Justices, neither Ruth Bader Ginsburg nor Clarence Thomas said anything obviously tipping their hands. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:19 am
He didn’t get it. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
We couldn’t get rid of it even if we wanted to, and we shouldn’t even if we could. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
When asked by Justice Clarence Thomas how the statute could have been written differently to align with the government’s view, Rosenberg responded that Congress “could have said that the bar applies to this section, not subsection … I mean, Congress could have included subsection (j) in subsection (c) at the outset, and it didn’t do that. [read post]
