Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2012, 6:17 pm
(B) Limitation A reevaluation conducted under subparagraph (A) shall occur— (i) not more frequently than once a year, unless the parent and the local educational agency agree otherwise; and (ii) at least once every 3 years, unless the parent and the local educational agency agree that a reevaluation is unnecessary. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:29 pm
Jarvis v Evans & Anor (2020) EWCA Civ 854 The question for the Court of Appeal on this second appeal was does failing to be licensed under the Housing (Wales) Act 2014 prevent a landlord from serving any notice seeking possession, or just a section 21 notice? [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
R (Jakimaviciute) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham [2013] EWHC 4372 (Admin) [Not generally available yet. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
R (Jakimaviciute) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham [2013] EWHC 4372 (Admin) [Not generally available yet. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
El-Moslimany, so I thought I'd file an amicus brief offering my analysis; but of course I want to first make sure my analysis is right. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
App. 628, 11 S.W. 669 (1889); Dixon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm
” d. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
State of Indiana - Andre Deshazier was convicted of carrying a handgun without a license, a Class C felony, two counts of resisting law enforcement, a Class D felony and a Class A misdemeanor, and possession of marijuana, a Class A misdemeanor. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
LEXIS 92945, 2009 WL 3171798 (D. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
Secondly, they would face a number of practical difficulties in running their case: (a) they may not be able to obtain legal representation; (b) even if they could it would be more difficult to give adequate instructions; (c) they might not be able to give oral evidence at the hearing; and (d) they might not be able to obtain professional evidence from their probation officer and/or a consultant forensic psychiatrist about their risk of re-offending. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
L. c. 265, § 43A, as interpreted by this Court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 2:31 pm
The assessing officer concluded that PO was likely to be still receiving the funds otherwise. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
The decision states:A motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) should not be granted “unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
It does not require, for instance, depriving someone of “equal privileges and immunities under the laws” (a provision (c) claim). [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:21 am
Last week, in Verdone v Verdone, 2022 WL 454048 [N. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
A recent Delaware Court opinion, Bay Center Apartments Owner, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:14 am
Hearst v Ganzi (2006) 145 CA4th 1195. [read post]
