Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 32,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm
Dec. 8, 2011) (Browning, J.) , addresses an issue of Fourth Amendment law that touches on Second Amendment concerns: In a concealed carry state, does police observation that a person is in possession of a concealed weapon create “reasonable suspicion” justifying a stop and frisk for a potential violation of the state’s concealed carry law? [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:02 pm
Consumers can identify the recalled product, which is in 8-ounce packages, by looking for the UPC number 0 70560 97799 9, any production codes beginning with “2138XD” and a best-by date of Aug. 1, 2020. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Ct. at 1294) (alteration in original).Id. at *7-8 (text added).Step 1: Abstract Idea? [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:18 pm
” Id. at *8. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm
The Court does not find that this gave defendants probable cause to arrest Mr. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:18 am
The 12-Step DRE Protocol 1. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 2:08 am
The board notes that the above cited definition of "post-surgical pain" refers to pain in general arising from surgery and does not exclude any type of pain, in particular, it does not exclude neuropathic pain. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 6:13 pm
” Cal.Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040(2)(K). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:10 am
Thank god football is back, where else but NFL week 1 does blind faith reign supreme and delusional face painters make crazy predictions about future outcomes….but enough about Dallas Cowboy fans. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
However the Enlarged Board of Appeal also held that:"This negative effect does not apply to European patents granted before 1 July 2017 and European patent applications which were filed before that date and are still pending" (ibid).4. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
July 8, 2003); Luke v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
The following extract from the decision indicates that the DC Circuit relied on the plain meaning of INA 214(a)(1); 8 USC 1184(a)(1) rather than paying Chevron deference to the DHS’s interpretation of those provisions: The 2016 Rule is within DHS’s statutory authority. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:18 am
However, that does not mean that that those bodies are relieved of the obligations arising from the principles of sound administration of justice and equal treatment. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:31 am
The Supreme Court found that Nestlé and Cargill were not liable for human rights abuses on the farm in an 8-1 decision. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:44 am
§1003.2(b)(1); see 8 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm
” The evident skepticism does not bring a bench ruling, though; we’ll apparently await decision on the motion. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:26 pm
He does not challenge the rejections of claims 6-14 and 16-33.In re Imes, at *1-2. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
Question #1 – General What exactly is the Visa Waiver Program? [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In the Proposition 8 case, the key procedural question is whether the sponsors of the Proposition 8 initiative have standing under Article III of the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 11:31 pm
[the General Condemnation Act of 1888] See 8 U.S.C. [read post]
