Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 29,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 9:51 am
The parties agree that because the subject alimony order was issued in Connecticut, Connecticut has continuing exclusive subject matter jurisdiction to modify the alimony order pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-212h (f) (1). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Gyzenis, 834 F.3d 162.The Circuit Court said it had jurisdiction to review an "interlocutory order denying qualified immunity so long as defendants pursue the appeal ‘on stipulated facts, or on the facts that the plaintiff alleges are true, or on the facts favorable to the plaintiff that the trial judge concluded the jury might find. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Gyzenis, 834 F.3d 162.The Circuit Court said it had jurisdiction to review an "interlocutory order denying qualified immunity so long as defendants pursue the appeal ‘on stipulated facts, or on the facts that the plaintiff alleges are true, or on the facts favorable to the plaintiff that the trial judge concluded the jury might find. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Gyzenis, 834 F.3d 162.The Circuit Court said it had jurisdiction to review an "interlocutory order denying qualified immunity so long as defendants pursue the appeal ‘on stipulated facts, or on the facts that the plaintiff alleges are true, or on the facts favorable to the plaintiff that the trial judge concluded the jury might find. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Gyzenis, 834 F.3d 162.The Circuit Court said it had jurisdiction to review an "interlocutory order denying qualified immunity so long as defendants pursue the appeal ‘on stipulated facts, or on the facts that the plaintiff alleges are true, or on the facts favorable to the plaintiff that the trial judge concluded the jury might find. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 3:34 am
Hofbauer, 263 F.3d 542, (6th Cir. 2001);We conclude, however, that Lopez cannot meet this standard. [read post]
10 May 2022, 10:12 am
.), which strikes me as consistent with the precedents: Plaintiffs Robert F. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:10 am
One question is whether the Defendant could have accomplished all this by himself. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:02 pm
See Buckner, 179 F.3d at 838; Carranza, 289 F.3d at 637-39; see also Valencia-Amezcua, 278 F.3d at 907-08 (noting defendant’s physical and temporal proximity to the crime scene) [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
Aminatou Haidar is the 2008 Robert F. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:35 am
Defendant acted out on a flight, acting strangely, and demanding that the flight land. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm
Edward F. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Rexam Beverage Can Co., 679 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:34 pm
Defendant's parole officer was looking for defendant and had a warrant for taking him. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:54 am
Berenguer, 562 F.2d at 210. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:19 am
Rushen, 770 F.2d 491, 495 (9th Cir. 1985).* Search incident includes the area in defendant's "immediate presence," and this search finding drugs was lawful. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
Lucania, 379 F. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
Waller, 426 F.3d at 845-46. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:17 pm
There was also nexus to defendant's property. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:43 am
Jones & Co., 324 F.3d 1346, 1355 (Fed. [read post]
